Welfare reforms could leave single parents facing poverty

May 17, 2010

Print This Post Print This Post

Welfare reformsNew research conducted by Murdoch University and University of Western Australia (UWA) has shown that major reforms to the child support system and parenting benefits has left single parents more likely to experience poverty.

Associate Professor Lisa Young, from Murdoch’s School of Law, said that one of the key goals when the child support system was introduced was to reduce the likelihood of children experiencing poverty.

“One would have thought that, when introducing the reforms, their combined effect on single parents would be considered,” Ms Young said.

“However, no modelling was done and even now, reports that emerge discussing the impacts of the reforms fail to address the issue of the combined effect of these changes.”

To assess the impact of the changes a model was developed to indicate the potential changes to income for single parents affected by both sets of reforms.

“The findings indicate that single parents are more likely to experience poverty after the reforms than was previously the case as their disposable income may decrease dramatically if they meet the minimum workforce participation requirement of 15 hours, introduced under Welfare to Work,” Ms Young said.

“Only those single parents with at least average earnings are better off.

“At low levels of income, single parents are worse off under the reforms, and this loss peaks around $22,000 income.

“This is particularly concerning because this is the sort of income level one would expect from a single parent doing low paid unskilled work during school hours.”

Ms Young said if the government’s aim was to encourage single parents into the workforce, it was questionable whether inflicting short term financial pain would work.

“Research indicates that single mothers are already a motivated group in terms of workforce participation, and that it is often other barriers to work which restrict their engagement in full-time work,” she said.

“These reforms do not address any of those other barriers, such as, the educational and career disadvantages faced by those women for whom family support has been their primary work, a lack of family friendly arrangements in the workplaces of fathers and mothers, as well as a shortage of low cost, readily available child care.

“The danger of these reforms is that, rather than providing the support necessary to enable single parents to increase their workforce participation, these changes will drive more single parent families into poverty.”

Ms Young worked in conjunction with Associate Professor Dr Paul Flatau, from the Murdoch Business School and Dr Tracey Summerfield (then at UWA’s School of Law).  The research was funded by UWA and Murdoch University.

Media contact: Hayley Mayne
Tel: (08) 9360 2491  |  Mobile: 0400 297 221  |  Email: h.mayne@murdoch.edu.au
Categories: General, Health, biomedicine and psychology, Research
Tags: , , ,

Comments (3 responses)

Emily May 28, 2010

Hi,

This artical is more then true. I am a single mother looking to get back into the work force and more then struggling to provide for my Childen. I have sole Custody of both my kids and the cost of living and rent is crippling me to the point I am facing eviction coz I missed 2 weeks rent so I could by a decent amount of food and pay some bills.

Unfortunatly though this is looking like becoming a way of life for us. I cant find work but if I do get work it has to be more then $45k a year (full time) to cover all my cost of Daycare and rent and what not!

It was a great read though. Thank you :)

Bernd November 16, 2012

Great blog you have here but I was curious about if you knew of any discussion boards that cover the
same topics discussed in this article? I'd really like to be a part of group where I can get feed-back from other knowledgeable people that share the same interest. If you have any recommendations, please let me know. Kudos!

Assoc Prof Young November 16, 2012

Hi Bernd,
I am not aware of any such discussion boards. There isnt a whole lot out there, but you might like to scan the Australian Journal of Family Law (LexisNexis) as we (I am the Editor) publish some material that is relevant to this topic.

Leave a comment

You can use these tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

We read every comment and will make every effort to approve each new comment within one working day. To ensure speedy posting, please keep your comments relevant to the topic of discussion, free of inappropriate language and in-line with the editorial integrity of this newsroom. If not, your comments may not be published.

Thanks for commenting!