Unfashionable Aussie mammals need research attention

March 7, 2016

Print This Post Print This Post

The 'ugly' ghost bat (Pic: Mark Cowan)

The 'ugly' ghost bat (Pic: Mark Cowan)

Australian native rodents and bats have attracted little research effort and funding, resulting in poor conservation and management, a recent study has revealed.

Associate Professor Trish Fleming from Murdoch University and co-author Dr Bill Bateman from Curtin University have called for conservation funding to be directed towards long-term monitoring and basic research undertakings into these species.

In a new paper for the journal Mammal Review, Professor Fleming and Dr Bateman reviewed the published literature for each of the 331 Australian mammal species and found they could be grouped into three categories: the ‘good’ (e.g. kangaroos, echidnas, koalas), the ‘bad’ (e.g. introduced and invasive species like rabbits, cats and foxes) and the ‘ugly’ (microbats and hopping mice).

Despite making up 45 per cent of the species investigated for the study, those categorised as ‘ugly’ had attracted little scientific attention.

“Current global and national conservation funding largely overlooks these species, and yet these may arguably be most in need of research effort,” said Professor Fleming.

“For the majority of species, researchers have been able to do little more than catalogue their existence. We need to document observations of their diets, habitat selection, space use and reproduction in order to identify threats and management options.

“Within Australia, Federal Government funding is largely directed towards investigating invasive species, and with no global funding to support biodiversity conservation research, Australian mammals face a significant plight.”

She also highlighted that researchers were discouraged from investigating some of the more obscure species because resulting paper submissions are likely to be turned away by the editorial boards of the highest impact international journals for being ‘parochial and of limited interest’.

Professor Fleming and Dr Bateman call for improved funding and political backing to help conservation agencies protect species and say citizen science programs could help to increase research capacity.

Their paper can be viewed here.

Leave a comment

You can use these tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

We read every comment and will make every effort to approve each new comment within one working day. To ensure speedy posting, please keep your comments relevant to the topic of discussion, free of inappropriate language and in-line with the editorial integrity of this newsroom. If not, your comments may not be published.

Thanks for commenting!