Opinion: Yes education funding has increased but not everyone benefits September 16, 2016 Since the release of the Productivity Commission draft report, there has been an insistent claim that achievement has declined despite spending more. In a collaborative piece in The Conversation, Associate Professor Laura Perry discusses how this claim is misleading and overly simplistic. The article states: “When politicians or the Productivity Commission report on school funding, these reports tend to exclusively report the net recurrent funding per student, and exclude levels of capital funding for the school. “Schools that educate a large proportion of high socioeconomic status (SES) students tend to receive less recurrent funding from the government. However, these schools also tend to receive more in the form of capital funding. “Rather than create a clearer and more transparent system of funding, the claim that is being marketed to the public is that funding has increased. “This denies the fact that equitable funding has not increased. “The schools that thrive or benefit from this model are those with a clear starting advantage – a wealthy customer base with the ability to bring in a higher level of private funding.” The full article can be read here. Print This Post Media contact: Pepita Smyth Tel: (08) 9360 1289 | Mobile: 0417 171 551 | Email: email@example.com Categories: General, Teaching and Learning, Future Students, School of Education, School of Education Research Tags: School of Education, education, laura perry, productivity commission, the conversation Leave a comment Name (required) Mail (will not be published) (required) Website You can use these tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> We read every comment and will make every effort to approve each new comment within one working day. To ensure speedy posting, please keep your comments relevant to the topic of discussion, free of inappropriate language and in-line with the editorial integrity of this newsroom. If not, your comments may not be published. Thanks for commenting!